This is it. Last post. I can’t believe It’s been nine weeks…well maybe ten or twelve, but that’s besides the point. We have finished. We have survived 23 Things and lived to tell the tale. I tried to find a clip of Chris Isaak’s “End of Everything” video on YouTube, but apparently no one loves song but me. It would have been absolutely perfect for the post. Alas.
I’m glad I sucked it up and did this. I’m a techno-phobe. It doesn’t seem like it, but it’s true – so this gave me a real excuse to swallow the bile and venture into blogland. Three cheers. I’m also not afraid to cut and paste html now. Impressive, hmmm? Who gets a blue star (they look cooler than the gold ones)? I do! I do! I can already see where all this Web 2.0 stuff is going to come in handy. It’s nice to be able to have conversations with folks when they ask, “So what is this Two Lives I keep hearing so much about?” I guess it’s an improvement over, “So, there was this mystery where someone dies. It was written in 1975. It had a blue cover. Can you help me?”
I won’t say goodbye. Season finales tend to be so overrated, just ta for now.
PS - Picture by Pingüino
Tuesday, July 31, 2007
Monday, July 23, 2007
3-2-1!
This week we were to check-out and download videos and podcasts. This is VERY exciting since that means I got to meander through YouTube. Anybody remember the old show 3-2-1-Contact?! I used to LOVE IT!!! What about the Bloudhound Gang mystery show? What a hoot. The best episode was when they went to that spooky house that had the train going around with the cardboad sillhoutes attached to make it look like there were people inside. So very clever...
Anyway. Been having some troubles loading stuff directly to my blog. I keep getting a nice red FORBIDDEN message when I type in my username and password (which are actually valid). I've been able to get around them by just copying and pasting the HTML code. Don't I feel all geeked out.
Lots of potential for this technology for the library. I can just see a video tour of the facilities that folks can download, tutorials, etc. Now, if we could just find the time.
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
Who Knew
So our researchers are hard at work and one of them sends me a personality test to see of I'm Rock, Paper, or Scissors:
You Are Paper |
Crafty and creative, you are able to adapt freely to almost any situation. People tend to underestimate you, unless they've truly seen what you are capable of. Deep down, you're always scheming and thinking up new plans. Your mind is constantly active. You are quite capable of anything you dream of. You can always figure out a way to get what you want. You can wrap a rock person up in your sheet of trickery. A scissor person can sneak up and cut you to pieces. When you fight: No one can anticipate your next move If someone makes you mad: You'll attack them mercilessly when they're unprepared |
Monday, July 16, 2007
The One Where Some Things Work and Others Don't
Shiver me timbers. The sheer delight I felt at plucking away at my ol' keyboard. Who knew that word processing could be so... Oh. Oh. Wait...I can't do this. I can't fake it over web based apps (Zoho Writer)- no matter how versatile it is. I'm sorry.
However, I can see where it might be useful for folks who are collaborating on a document. Plus, how nice is it for me to write-up my blog post and then just upload it right from here?! (Yes, I love re-entering my username and password to no avail. I prefer cutting and pasting, really.) That's convenient. Bah-humbug.
Now, onto the Web 2.0 Awards. There were some mighty fine contenders listed here. I'm going to mention two. Working in the Outback, it gets mighty lonesome. One might find themselves speaking to imaginary friends or humming little ditties while they rock back in forth snacking on locks ofmy their hair. But never fear, Pandora.com has come to my the rescue. This lovely site allows you to create your VERY OWN RADIO station - commercial free. You simply type in a song or band you like, and they play somthing they think is along that genre. You can then give it a thumbs up or down. Because of licensing issues, you're limited to the number of vetoes you can give in an hour. In addition, rate hikes suggested in the Internet Radio Equality Act may impact the site in the future.
One other site I liked was RealTravel.com. Love the fact I can search by activity, and then drill down by place AND read blogs of folks who have actually been there. Can we say, practical?!
However, I can see where it might be useful for folks who are collaborating on a document.
Now, onto the Web 2.0 Awards. There were some mighty fine contenders listed here. I'm going to mention two. Working in the Outback, it gets mighty lonesome. One might find themselves speaking to imaginary friends or humming little ditties while they rock back in forth snacking on locks of
One other site I liked was RealTravel.com. Love the fact I can search by activity, and then drill down by place AND read blogs of folks who have actually been there. Can we say, practical?!
Monday, July 9, 2007
Wikid Wikis
Whenever I see the word wiki I think of the Wizard of Oz and the Winkies. Who knows, right? Anyway, this week’s assignment was to explore wikis and all their wonderful wikidness.
We’ve been talking about them for years, even played around with our own last year with a subscription from a certain vendor that I believe started with a jot and ended with a spot – but don’t quote me on that. The problem was it was a bit clunky for us and no one wanted to add anything. You have to have a good foundation product before you can get buy-in from the staff and public, yes?
I checked out a couple of examples that were provided at 23 Things. Most of the library wikis tend to catalog and sort books (just a rehash of what they do already – boring), but Book Lovers Wiki was nice and different and actually had some book reviews with star ratings. Big thumbs up on that. I also liked the theory behind Library Success: A best practices wiki, but again, you run into the problem of folks not populating. So while it looks pretty and there is some real implications for knowledge sharing there, this is a case where if you build it - it doesn’t neccesarily mean they’ll come.
If, and I do mean IF our library were to try its hand at wikis again, I see them as more of an internal use. A place to post instructional and proceedural manuals – you know, as a centralized place to update and access. If we were to open it to the public (as in Center public), then we might convert the KAs to wiki format (which won’t happen) to allow everyone the ability to update.
We’ve been talking about them for years, even played around with our own last year with a subscription from a certain vendor that I believe started with a jot and ended with a spot – but don’t quote me on that. The problem was it was a bit clunky for us and no one wanted to add anything. You have to have a good foundation product before you can get buy-in from the staff and public, yes?
I checked out a couple of examples that were provided at 23 Things. Most of the library wikis tend to catalog and sort books (just a rehash of what they do already – boring), but Book Lovers Wiki was nice and different and actually had some book reviews with star ratings. Big thumbs up on that. I also liked the theory behind Library Success: A best practices wiki, but again, you run into the problem of folks not populating. So while it looks pretty and there is some real implications for knowledge sharing there, this is a case where if you build it - it doesn’t neccesarily mean they’ll come.
If, and I do mean IF our library were to try its hand at wikis again, I see them as more of an internal use. A place to post instructional and proceedural manuals – you know, as a centralized place to update and access. If we were to open it to the public (as in Center public), then we might convert the KAs to wiki format (which won’t happen) to allow everyone the ability to update.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)